Boycott "Boycott Novell!"

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Boycott "Boycott Novell!"

Comments Policy, and Some Examples of What Not to Do

E-mail Print PDF

As the editor of this site, I'll be moderating comments.

I will particularly be moderating comments that are senseless, inane, vituperative, in conflict with actual facts or with physical reality, scatological, sexist, violent or otherwise lacking in reason. On the other hand, I may decide to single them out for particular attention, deconstruction and dissection. One never knows; pay your money, take your chances. (Negative bonus points for being an Anonymous Coward. If you don't have an identity, you don't have an opinion that you care about; nor should I.)

If you would like to talk to me about "freedom of speech" or "freedom of the press" and how yours is being trampled, or I'm abusing mine, feel free to set up your own blog and tell the world all about it. Freedom of the press does not mean that you are free to use my press. Getting in your very own is easy enough in this Brave New World of The Future.

In the way of some guidelines, allow me to provide a few real life examples of what's not worth wasting your, or my, time on. These are reproduced in toto, as received, and are completely unedited.

< This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it > writes

corporate scum

Don't hate me because I have a job. Here's a tip for you: if you've been sending out your resumes from that address, I'd use a different one.

< This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it > advises

you should delete your website. It is asinine and in case you're wondering, is as pro microsoft as it can get. Nice job, but you've already been uncovered. Just in case you're wondering, what you're doing does border on libel as I don't see actual fact behind it. DIAF.

In case you're wondering, "DIAF" is an acronym for "Die in a fire". Evidently, "Double Plus Ungood" here not only wants people who hold opinions (regarding software!) which are contrary to his, and who have the temerity to express them, to suffer a painful death, but wishes it on others often enough to feel a need to optimize his typing time.

(See? That's a sickness, friend, Double-Plus-Insane. Seek some professional help, you are suffering from an extremely serious lack of perspective.)

If anyone feels they've been "libeled" here, please have your legal counsel contact me at "lefty" on identi.ca with the particulars. I can provide full contact details once I verify the legitimacy of the request. (My contact details are incredibly easy to find, but I've been amused at how difficult it seems to be for some. Took Mr. Schestowitz months.)

Finally, I am not a government (other than with respect to this web site, but then, I do pay the bills; if anyone wants to propose buying a comment to use as they please, let me know, by all means), so I cannot "censor" you. Again, if you feel the need to say something, and I don't think you need to say it here, for whatever reasons, you're quite free to go to Blogspot, Livejournal, TypePad, WordPress, Vox, or any number of other places, and get one gratis; rant to your heart's content. If those aren't "free" enough for you, let me know, and I'll see that you get an invite code for Dreamwidth.

Add a comment
Last Updated on Saturday, 03 October 2009 20:33
 

An Open Letter to Brandon Lozza

E-mail Print PDF
User Rating: / 7
PoorBest 

 

"CLOSED FOR THE TIME BEING"

Mm-hm. Let me clue you into something, and I mean this with sincere and grandmotherly kindness.

It takes a certain amount of not only spine, but character, to play this game. I've been at it for considerably longer than you've been in existence. I don't believe you've got what it takes, either in raw talent or in wherewithal, and your sudden non-existence on Twitter, identi.ca and the web confirm that.

Why don't you take a six-month vacation from "advocacy", offer your apologies for being an egregious dope, and actually crack a book and try your hand at some coding? Microsoft isn't hiding under your bed, and they're really not interested in molesting you.

One can accomplish quite a lot in six months if one isn't constantly distracted by the tawdry and passing allure of talking moronic smack to people who have forgotten more than you ever knew.

By the way: learn to read a domain record. Then you won't be bothering the wrong people with your errant, improper and misdirected DMCA takedown requests.

Love,

Lefty

 

Add a comment
Last Updated on Wednesday, 13 January 2010 20:17
 

If Proprietary Software is "Illegitimate", Why is the FSF Funded by It?

E-mail Print PDF
User Rating: / 13
PoorBest 

One of the more interesting statements to come up in the course of the current fracas over Planet GNOME is Richard Stallman's declaration that he "would not encourage anyone to use proprietary software even to get money to give to a worthy cause".

Does the FSF put it's money where its mouth is, though? A glance at the FSF's "Corporate Patrons" page, which includes IBM, Intel, Nokia NEC, Cisco, Barracuda, and many other companies which derive significant amounts of their revenue from proprietary software, suggests that there's more hypocrisy than reality to Stallman's claim. In aggregate, these "Corporate Patron" organizations provide funding to the FSF in excess of a quarter-million dollars annually.

If Stallman is sincere in his beliefs that all proprietary software is "illegitimate", "unethical" and "antisocial", I would call on the Free Software Foundation to turn back any corporate funding which is not directly and completely derived from free software, without any taint of "illegitimacy", and start holding bake sales and putting up lemonade stands to make up for the lost income.

Add a comment
 

A Small Change to the Survey

E-mail Print PDF

On the suggestion of some of the respondents, I've added the choice "Other" to the questions on whether one feels that proprietary software is either "illegitimate", "immoral/unethical" or "antisocial".

If you feel the available choices did not reflect your view, you can go back and retake the survey. Your responses will only be counted a single time.

Thanks to all who have participated so far, and please spread the word on this survey. I'd like to get as broad a cross-section of the community as possible. Accordingly, I've mentioned it on the general mailing list for the upcoming FOSDEM conference, the GNOME foundation-list, the FSF-Europe's Legal & Licensing Network list, as well as Twitter, identi.ca, Facebook and, of course, here. I've also provided the information to Simon Bridge, one of the moderators of the FSF's Community Response Team list.

I'd post it on Boycott Novell! but Roy won't allow me to.

Once again, the survey can be taken at http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/F8DG25Q

The results so far can be viewed at http://bit.ly/74WQBI

Add a comment
Last Updated on Friday, 15 January 2010 19:54
 

A New Survey!

E-mail Print PDF

I'm conducting a new survey, this time on attitudes around FLOSS and proprietary software. I expect people who didn't like the previous survey will find this one somewhat more to their liking. Please pass around the link to the survey below as widely as you can: we got over 1500 respondents to the last survey, which was terrific!

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/F8DG25Q

[UPDATE: Survey results can be viewed, in something like real-time, here.]

Add a comment
Last Updated on Wednesday, 13 January 2010 21:51
 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  7 
  •  8 
  •  9 
  •  10 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »


Page 1 of 11

Newsflash

Contrary to the representations of Bruce "What's the problem?" Perens and others, it seems that Richard Stallman is indeed capable of issuing (or perhaps, being made to issue) an apology!

More details...