Welcome to Boycott “Boycott Novell!”

Two terrible tastes that go great together?

mark-on-backThere’s a weird consistency with which the most publicly vocal partisans of the position that Microsoft is a wholly owned subsidiary of Hell also seem to regularly express the opinion that there’s really no problem, or at least no problem worth talking about, with women in the open source software community.

  • 2009 has been a pretty hair-raising year from the standpoint of women’s involvement in open source development.
  • Coming in, we knew that the level of participation by women in our projects is around 1.5%, versus a level close to twenty times that in the proprietary software world. And we’ve seen

A heavily sexualized presentation by Matt Aimonetti at the Golden Gate Ruby Conference
An even more heavily sexualized presentation (NSFW) by Hoss Gifford at Flashbelt
A bit of “harmless fun” from Richard Stallman at the Gran Canaria Desktop Summit involving his “holy duty” to “relieve” specifically female “EMACS virgins” of their “virginity”
Most recently, a keynote from Mark Shuttleworth at LinuxCon, containing, in the space of less than an hour, a hooker joke, a comment about how difficult printing is to explain to “your mom or your grandmom”, and another on how much trouble “we” have explaining what “we” do to “girls”

What’s interesting here is to note who’s taking the position that there really isn’t an issue worth talking about here. In Carla Schroder’s recent columns on “Sexism in the FOSS Community”, among the voices wondering what all the fuss is about are anonymo-nauts such as “GreyGeek”, “twitter” and “Jose_X”, all Boycott Novell regulars.


During the fracas over GCDS, Roy Schestowitz was one of the first to attempt the moronic diversion of claiming that it was “really all about Mono”. As though even if it were, somehow, “about Mono” (which it’s not, don’t get excited), that makes it okay, in some way, for the president of the FSF to make clearly sexist jokes about nonconsensually deflowering the female members of the audience, in a context where they’re outnumbered at a ratio of about thirty-to-one.

Is the Free Software Foundation hypocritical in seeking, and receiving, funding from companies which sell proprietary software?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Schestowitz found himself obliged to issue an apology and a full retraction. Schestowitz was equally quick to blow off Shuttleworth’s poor idea of humor: “Instead of ‘Mark Shuttleworth’, that remark which rubbed Susan the wrong way could just as well come from ‘Steve Ballmer‘ or ‘Steve Jobs‘.”

Except that it didn’t. It’s difficult to know whether Schestowitz finds these inanities persuasive; if so, that’s rather sad. It’s no surprise that nowhere in his equivocations does Schestowitz display any familiarity with the concept of an “apology”.

I found this picture, from the Boycott Novell site


We see a similar pattern with Sam Varghese around Mark Shuttleworth’s recent unfortunate statements and Richard Stallman’s earlier ones. Varghese (who once devoted four full pages to brutalizing and bullying a 20-year-old college student over a blog posting) likes to remind everyone that he reported on the DebianChix fracas a while back as credentials, but he seems pretty content to rest on his laurels now.

Guide on How To Fly a Quadcopter – Right Direction

You may have noticed some pretty amazing flying devices today. UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) are becoming increasingly common. Fans also are receiving a growing number of take one. But along with an excellent selection of models and brands that you may wonder, what is the upper quadcopter to begin with.

You will find a number of variations on family members multirotor. In essence, the most common is the quadcopter, such as DJI Phantom. Quadcopter uses four engines and propellers to create the momentum necessary to lift the plane.

May be mechanically simpler than the traditional main helicopter also requires the tail rotor to counter the torque angular torsion developed by the main rotor, the rotor collective pitch and requires no other mechanical complexities. And permitted the existence of flying Quadcopter pitch and the handle is fixed to actively change the engine RPM (Rounds Per Minute).

If you want to move forward, and two rear engines rotate faster and also two front engines rotate slower. This tends plane forward, and vector orientation in this way. If you want to shoot and then apply exactly the same principle, but in all parts of the lateral sides. If you need guidance, then you’ll certainly recognize the angular torque. Foot spinning object commensurate with the rate at which the torque is going on.

This is why you see in the main rotor helicopter classics like the tail rotor. In the event that the main rotor rotates counter-clockwise, the entire plane you want to rotate in a clockwise direction to keep the angular momentum. This is why the tail rotor, which results in the momentum necessary to confront the forces of angular momentum necessary. Feel free to visit our Quadcopter Reviews page for more information regarding Drones and Quadcopters.

Even in the quadcopter, are configured so that all of the engines cancel each other out several people. So once you want to yaw (left or right), then two engines facing each other diagonally to reduce speed, and the other two facing each other to increase them. This keeps the lift necessary to keep rising, but the couple transfer torque angle plane that tends to rotate it.

Now it will be impossible to get the rights to calculate precisely the extent of the change in rpm to provide engines quadctopers individual to support management, so that these accounts by the Board of flight control. It is usually equipped with this dish pyrometer and acceleration in some cases. He has a program that controls the engines are primarily based on the position of the aircraft, and user input on the transmitter.



In order that it may possibly all sound somewhat difficult, but fear not, because all these things are complex to deal with in the council flight control. All you have to worry about two sticks one way and one or more step. Even quadcopter will help you to get out of the ground faster? Among my all-time favorite of quadcopters newbies may be a piece Syma X1. Is really very affordable, and will fly very effectively. Wltoys v959 Quadcopter is a ideal alternative to Syma X1 model.

This comes with 2.4 GHz transmitter so as to be able to fly in the outdoors and became a very large scale. Another good rookie quadcopter is MQX Blade. This can be a little quadcopter great worker and also interesting is the fact that it is in fact compatible with other radios so you must not rely on the one that came. Both difficult and will provide hours of flight time leisure.